Cybersecurity for banking, fintech, and payment processors

Vulnerabilities caught before merge.

Every pull request to your core, reviewed inline — inside the development flow. Coverage across CWE, OWASP Top 10, and OWASP LLM Top 10.

The problem

Volume grew. Human review didn't.

Argentina was the third most-attacked country in Latin America in 2025. In June of that year, 19 million BCRA records appeared on the dark web. BCRA Communication “A” 7724 already requires continuous IT and infosec risk management at every authorized institution.

01

A new class of vulnerability: AI-generated code.

Copilot, Cursor, and internal agents generate code at machine speed. The typical insecure patterns — hardcoded secrets, silent error handling, incomplete validation — land in systems that move money.

OWASP LLM Top 10 · emerging risk categories
02

Traditional SAST doesn't scale to PR cadence.

Linters and scanners run overnight against the whole repo, return thousands of findings buried in legacy noise, and nobody reads them. Review arrives too late.

Early detection: remediating before merge costs less
03

The cost of an incident concentrates in finance.

Settlement, posting, antifraud, SWIFT/ISO-20022 messaging — a defect in these systems carries disproportionate regulatory and reputational impact.

BCRA “A” 7724: requires continuous IT risk management in Argentine banking
Product

One decision: nothing merges without review.

Vora connects to your GitHub or GitLab organization and reviews every pull request in real time. It works alongside your reviewers — it doesn't replace them.

01

Continuous PR-level audit.

Every change that touches sensitive code gets inline review in under 90 seconds. SWC, CWE, and repository-specific invariants covered.

02

Control over AI-generated code.

Detects and flags pull requests with a high share of assisted code. Typical LLM-introduced insecure patterns are surfaced before integration.

03

Risk reduction in critical repositories.

Findings categorized by delta: what the PR introduced, what was already there, what it resolves. Your team only sees what changed.

04

Traceability for regulatory audit.

Every finding and decision recorded with auditable evidence. Logs exportable to SIEM or GRC. Aligned with BCRA “A” 7724, CNV, and Argentina's data-protection law.

How it works

From pull request to merge. No context switch.

01 · GitHub

Pull request opened

Webhook to Vora. No scanner to run, no binaries to install.

02 · Review

Inline comments

Vora annotates the exact lines. Categorizes new · inherited · resolved by the PR.

03 · Slack

“@vora fix H-1”

Rewrites the function, runs the build, opens a fix PR linked to the original.

04 · Merge

Your team decides

Vora never merges. Your CI, your reviewers, your final sign-off.

github.com/banco-acme/core-banking · pull/2 814 · feat(accounts): lookup by customer ID
open · +24 −0
open

feat(accounts): add lookup by customer ID · #2814 · 2 commits · m.acosta wants to merge into main

+24 −0
src/main/java/com/bancoacme/accounts/AccountRepository.java+5−082% AI-generated
15 }
16
17+ public Account findByCustomerId(String customerId) {
18+ return jdbc.queryForObject(
19+ "SELECT * FROM accounts WHERE customer_id = '" + customerId + "'",
20+ accountMapper);
21+ }
Vvora-bot · review on AccountRepository.java:19 · 38 seconds ago

High · H-1CWE-89 · SQL Injection

New findByCustomerId concatenates the customer-ID path parameter directly into the SQL. A request with ' OR '1'='1 in the path returns every account in the table — full enumeration, no authentication bypass needed.

Suggestion: parameterize the filter — use ? in the SQL and pass customerId as the bound argument, matching the JdbcTemplate shape used elsewhere in this file. LLM pattern: assisted code reaches for string concatenation when the dynamic input is "just one variable".

Risk-free pilot

Two weeks. No production access.

We connect to a repository of your choice in read-only mode. No commits, no merges, no production access. The pilot ends with an executive session covering findings and a formal adoption plan.

What a Vora pilot looks like

Day 1
Technical setup. 60 minutes. We connect the GitHub App with minimum read scopes. We list the repositories in scope.
Day 2–3
Historical analysis · 90 days. Vora analyzes the pull-request history to establish a baseline of inherited findings.
Day 4–14
Active inline review. The team receives comments on new pull requests. No merge blocking. Vora observes.
Day 15
Executive session. Report by severity · share of PRs with AI-assisted code · estimated MTTR · deployment plan.
Read-only · no writes to repositories or to production
Data in your VPC · no code exfiltration
Cancellable any day · no annual contract
Standard NDA and MSA · ready for legal review
Why now

The financial sector faces a new class of risk. Regulators are catching up.

BCRA Communication “A” 7724 mandates continuous IT and infosec risk management at every authorized financial institution. CNV regulates fintechs and payment-service providers. Continuous software review is the next natural requirement — better to be ahead.

A 7724
BCRA · in force in Argentina

Communication “A” 7724 updates the minimum requirements for managing, implementing, and controlling IT and information-security risk across every BCRA-authorized financial institution.

+24M
virtual-wallet accounts · AR

Argentina has more than 24 million active accounts at virtual wallets and regulated PSPs — a critical financial-software surface covered by CNV and BCRA.

CNV
expanding scope over fintechs and PSPs

The National Securities Commission is extending its regime over payment-service providers and digital custodians. Continuous review of the code that runs these platforms is the next natural requirement.

We start with a conversation.

30 minutes with your CISO, platform lead, or head of engineering. We leave with a defined pilot scope — or with the certainty that this isn't the right moment yet.